Monday, April 6, 2020

Expenditure reallocation, shortage of workers in agriculture, thinking beyond the lockdown

From The Kathmandu Post: The government has decided to divert Rs 136 billion from its annual budget allocations to fund efforts to combat the effects of the coronavirus epidemic. The finance ministry last week notified government agencies that the budget allocated under 14 headings such as land and vehicle procurement and organisation of seminars has been frozen to divert funds to prevent the spread of the contagious virus and to treat the infected.

However, the entire amount may not be available to the government as revenue collection is also expected to suffer due to the epidemic, and the government is yet to ascertain the size of liabilities already created based on the original budget. [...]In its budget for FY 2019/2020, the government had allocated the Rs 136.60 billion, which it now plans to divert, under 14 titles such as recurrent contingencies (Rs 29.39 billion), programme expenses (Rs28.26 billion) and land acquisition (Rs 28 billion).


From The Kathmandu Post: The nationwide lockdown, currently imposed until April 7, has forced tens of thousands of farmers indoors and away from their fields while also creating a shortage of hired labourers to work in the fields. The agriculture sector, which contributes 27 percent to the country's GDP, has already been affected by the comparatively low summer output, of paddy in particular, caused by the delayed monsoon, floods and disease.

Now, the Covid-19 pandemic has further dampened the prospects of a good spring harvest to make up for the summer months. Wheat is cultivated in over 900,000 hectares of land and it is currently harvest season. "The crops will soon wither away,” said Chaudhary. “But what else can we do but let them die? It’s not safe to go outside given the current situation.


From The Economic Times: We should now plan for what happens after the lockdown, if the virus is not defeated. It will be hard to lockdown the country entirely for much longer periods, so we should also be thinking of how we can restart certain activities in certain low infection regions with adequate precautions. Restarting requires better data on infection levels, as well as measures to protect workers returning to work, such as temperature checks of workers (though this will not catch non-symptomatic carriers), uncrowded transport, personal protection equipment, adequate distancing at work, as well as measures to identify and contain new infections. Healthy youth, lodged with appropriate distancing in hostels at the workplace, may be ideal workers for restarting.

[...]In the meantime, India obviously needs to ensure that the poor and non-salaried lower middle class who are prevented from working for longer periods can survive. Direct transfers to households may reach most but not all, as a number of commentators have pointed out. Furthermore, the quantum of transfers seems inadequate to see a household through a month.

The state and Centre have to come together to figure out quickly some combination of public and NGO provision (of food, healthcare and sometimes shelter), private participation (voluntary moratoria on debt payments and a community-enforced ban on evictions during the next few months), and direct benefit transfers (DBTs) that will allow needy households to see through the next few months. We have already seen one consequence of not doing so – the movement of migrant labour. Another will be people defying the lockdown to get back to work if they cannot survive otherwise.

Our limited fiscal resources are certainly a worry. However, spending on the needy at this time is a high priority use of resources, the right thing to do as a humane nation, as well as a contributor to the fight against the virus. This does not mean that we can ignore our budgetary constraints, especially given that our revenues will also be severely affected this year. [...]A ratings downgrade coupled with a loss of investor confidence could lead to a plummeting exchange rate and a dramatic increase in long term rates in this environment, and substantial losses for our financial institutions.

So we have to prioritise, cutting back or delaying less important expenditures, while refocussing on immediate needs. At the same time, to reassure investors, the government could express its commitment to return to fiscal rectitude, backing up its intent by accepting the setting up of an independent fiscal council and setting a medium term debt target, as suggested by the NK Singh committee.

[...]We need to think of innovative ways in which bigger viable ones, especially those that have considerable human and physical capital embedded in them, can be helped. SIDBI can make the terms of its credit guarantee of bank loans to SMEs even more favourable, but banks are unlikely to want to take on much more credit risk at this point. The government could accept responsibility for the first loss in incremental bank loans made to an SME, up to the quantum of income taxes paid by the SME in the past year. This recognises the likely future contribution of the SME to the government exchequer, and rewards it with easier access to funds today. Of course, this helps the SME only if the lending bank is prohibited from directing the SME to use the guaranteed loan to repay the bank’s past loans.

[...]Banks, insurance companies, and bond mutual funds should be encouraged to buy new investment grade bond issuances, and their way eased by the RBI agreeing to lend against their high quality bond portfolios through repo transactions. The RBI Act will have to be changed to enable the RBI to undertake these transactions, and it will have to apply suitable haircuts to these portfolios to minimise its credit risk, but it will be a much needed support to corporate borrowing. The government should also require each of its agencies and PSUs, including at the state level, to pay their bills immediately, so that private firms get valuable liquidity.

[...]The RBI has flooded the banking system with liquidity, but perhaps it needs to go beyond, for instance lending against high quality collateral to well managed NBFCs. However, more liquidity will not help absorb loan losses. NPAs will mount, including in retail loans as unemployment rises. The RBI should consider a moratorium on financial institution dividend payments so that they build capital reserves. Some institutions may nevertheless need more capital, and the regulator should be planning for that.