Saturday, November 20, 2010

Animal spirits of the Maoist party in Nepal

No, it is not consumer confidence that brings forth investment and prosperity-- referred by JM Keynes as “animal spirits”. I am talking about the real animal destructive spirits of the Maoist party in Nepal. Even after stepping into the political mainstream, they (not only the brainwashed, duped and indoctrinated cadres, but also the political brass) are as unruly as they were during those decade-long days in jungle. Definitely, some habits are hard to go by! The Maoist movement sustains through deception and constant bashing (and intimidation) of the population--“elite and feudal”. The Nepali Maoist party is an epitome of that outdated strategy.

Now, Keynes wondered the mystery of sudden entrepreneurial instincts (animal spirits) that drives innovation and all the goodies (and sometimes bad consequences) that come with it: "the thought of ultimate loss which often overtakes pioneers, as experience undoubtedly tells us and them, is put aside as a healthy man puts aside the expectation of death". No amount of political cajoling will revive animal spirits in entrepreneurs. It just happens when entrepreneurs feel that it is the right time. Alas, thanks to the Maoist party’s hostile attitude and policies toward businesses, Nepali people have not seen that time lately.

Robert Shiller explains:


The term "animal spirits," popularized by John Maynard Keynes in his 1936 book "The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money," is related to consumer or business confidence, but it means more than that. It refers also to the sense of trust we have in each other, our sense of fairness in economic dealings, and our sense of the extent of corruption and bad faith. When animal spirits are on ebb, consumers do not want to spend and businesses do not want to make capital expenditures or hire people.


Well, that is the economic side of animal spirits, which is usually good. We can only hope that Nepali people will experience those spirits very soon.

What the Maoist politicians did yesterday night was the result of the unleashing of real animal/jungle spirits. By preventing (and publicly fighting) the finance minister to announce the budget, they exhibited something that is very uncommon in Nepal’s parliamentary history. (btw, something like that happened in Ukraine’s parliament in April 2010, and in Taiwan as well; but they weren’t related to budget speech).

The Maoist party has been constantly changing positions and commitments despite multiple rounds of meetings and agreements with other parties. After all, what could be the best strategy to politically survive (with deception) than to be fickle to the extreme—divide and rule!  They change their political commitments and positions at the eleventh hour, holding hostage the economic future of the whole nation.

The country would have been a different place in a matter of just few years if the Maoist party had encouraged Keynes’s animal spirits. Alas, that won’t come true because if it did, then the Maoist would run out of reasons to dupe and brainwash the public to sway political tide their way. Instead, what we are getting is the real animal/jungle spirits time and again unleashed by the entire echelon of the Maoist political structure, jeopardizing economy, development, livelihoods, and future of millions of Nepali people who do not conform to the outdated ideology of the Maoist party. Political wrath aside, let me give a taste of how the delayed budget and the Maoist party’s hostility toward any progressive economic activity will hamper our economy:

  • Few economic activities and no new development works. It is already being put in the back burner for a year now. Think of no new roads linking rural villages, no public healthcare, no salary for teachers in public schools, no subsidies and cash transfers to needy ones, dysfunctional local administration (VDCs), and above all pay freeze of government employees.
  • Slowdown in private sector activities. A substantial portion of demand in the private sector comes from government contracts. With delayed budget and no development related activities included in it, private sector will lose demand. This has many consequences. First, many jobs are hinged on the government demand for services from the private sector. They will perish. Second, private sector takes loans to purchase raw materials and other accessories need to meet government demand. Usually, payment occurs after delivery of services demanded by the government. So, with no payment from government due to budget complexities, private sector will not be paid on time. They will in turn likely default on bank loans, dragging down and squeezing the very conduit that funnel money from one sector to another. It will bring the economic activity engine of the nation to a grinding halt.
  • The negative multiplier will potentially be very high. This means that Rs 1 investment will yield less than Rs 1 outcome. It will lead to an inefficient allocation and reallocation of resources.
  • The destructive activities of the Maoist party will create a strike-unemployment cycle. The impact of obstruction and destruction created right now will not end when the “jungle spirits” end. It drags on for quite some time as investors take time to rebuild confidence. Read this blog post to see how much the country bleeds if economy activities are  halted for a day. The jungle spirits of the Maoist party will potentially make Nepali people even more poorer in real terms, encourage brain drain, promote increasing migration to the Gulf countries for labor, erode business confidence, mock rule of law, create shortages… (you put the rest!)
  • There will be dire macroeconomic consequences. Already, our macroeconomic situation is going real bad. Balance of payments is in deficit. Industrial activity is down, exports are declining and imports are surging up. FDI has tanked. Private investment in critical infrastructure is hindered. Investments to relax binding constraints to growth are being blocked. Growth rate has stagnated below four percent. Inflation rate is double-digit. Daily consumable goods are getting expensive day by day. Major construction and rebuilding projects are being taken by political party affiliated organizations. Land price has shot up the ceiling. Donation campaigns are terrorizing business community. Businesses flourish only if they have blessing of the most militant youth wings, trade unions and politicians.
  • I can go on and on. The bottom line: the Maoist party’s activities have pushed development backward, contributed to making macroeconomic situation worse, stymied investment, halted employment opportunities, deadlocked political and economic future of the nation, deprived over 28 million citizens of some of their basic constitutionally and universally guaranteed rights, and basically made our lives worse.
  • When will we see the Maoist party’s “animal/jungle spirits” transform into JM Keynes’s “animal spirits”?

Friday, November 19, 2010

Dietary energy consumption in South Asia

Consumption of 9 major vegetal foods (2003-2005) 
FAO Stat 2009 DIETARY ENERGY CONSUMPTION (kcal/person/day)
COUNTRIES Rice Wheat Maize Pulses    Sugar    raw eq.  Potatoes Soybean oil Palm oil Rape & mustard oil
Bangladesh 1,580 172 30 41 51 42 39 78 16
India 699 498 39 108 172 28 45 67 40
Nepal 831 349 382 77 41 88 27 80 47
Pakistan 160 876 90 62 253 19 13 149 24
Sri Lanka 925 343 53 66 287 13 1   0

Apparently, Bangladeshis get the highest amount of calorie per day from rice. It is also true in India, Nepal and Sri Lanka. However, Pakistanis get the highest calorie per day from wheat. Rice is relative more popular in Bangladesh, wheat in Pakistan, maize in Nepal, pulses in India, sugar in Sri Lanka, potatoes in Nepal, soybean oil in India, palm oil in Pakistan, and rape & mustard oil in Nepal. The people in the Indian subcontinent have different tastes. (Source: FAO Statistical Year Book 2009)

Wednesday, November 17, 2010

Links of Interest (2010-11-17)


Climate Change, Agriculture and Poverty

Although much has been written about climate change and poverty as distinct and complex problems, the link between them has received little attention. Understanding this link is vital for the formulation of effective policy responses to climate change. This paper focuses on agriculture as a primary means by which the impacts of climate change are transmitted to the poor, and as a sector at the forefront of climate change mitigation efforts in developing countries. In so doing, the paper offers some important insights that may help shape future policies as well as ongoing research in this area.


How do governments respond to food price spikes? Lessons from the past

Food prices in international markets spiked upward in 2008, doubling or more in a matter of months. Evidence is still being compiled on policy responses over the following two years, but lessons can be learned from the price spike in 1973, the magnitude and speed of which were similar to those experienced around the 2008 spike. In developing countries, policy responses to the earlier spike lowered the (negative) nominal assistance coefficient for agriculture by one-third between 1972 and 1974 before it was returned to the same level by 1976. That was twice the extent of the fall and recovery of the (positive) nominal assistance coefficient for high-income countries. However, the trade and welfare effects of those changes were much less for developing than high-income countries, suggesting the dispersion of distortion rates among farm industries decreased in developing countries. The adjustments were virtually all due to suspension and then reinstatement of import restrictions, with changes in export taxation by developing countries playing an additional (but minor) role during 1972-74. This beggar-thy-neighbor dimension of each government’'s food policies is worrying because it reduces the role that trade between nations can play in bringing stability to the world’'s food markets. More effort appears to be needed before a multilateral agreement to desist can be reached.


The Economic Consequences of “Brain Drain” of the Best and Brightest

Brain drain has long been a common concern for migrant-sending countries, particularly for small countries where high-skilled emigration rates are highest. However, while economic theory suggests a number of possible benefits, in addition to costs, from skilled emigration, the evidence base on many of these is very limited. Moreover, the lessons from case studies of benefits to China and India from skilled emigration may not be relevant to much smaller countries. This paper presents the results of innovative surveys which tracked academic high-achievers from five countries to wherever they moved in the world in order to directly measure at the micro level the channels through which high-skilled emigration affects the sending country. The results show that there are very high levels of emigration and of return migration among the very highly skilled; the income gains to the best and brightest from migrating are very large, and an order of magnitude or more greater than any other effect; there are large benefits from migration in terms of postgraduate education; most high-skilled migrants from poorer countries send remittances; but that involvement in trade and foreign direct investment is a rare occurrence. There is considerable knowledge flow from both current and return migrants about job and study opportunities abroad, but little net knowledge sharing from current migrants to home country governments or businesses. Finally, the fiscal costs vary considerably across countries, and depend on the extent to which governments rely on progressive income taxation.


Climate Change 101: Know The Jargon

These are some climate change jargon that are in use all the time. Since climate change is a hot button issue these days and will be in the future, it is good to at least know what they are exactly talking about. These definitions are sourced from BBC News website.


Adaptation Action that helps cope with the effects of climate change - for example construction of barriers to protect against rising sea levels, or conversion to crops capable of surviving high temperatures and drought.

Adaptation fund A fund for projects and programmes that help developing countries cope with the adverse effects of climate change. It is financed by a share of proceeds from emission-reduction programmes such as the Clean Development Mechanism.

Annex I countries The industrialised countries (and countries in transition to a market economy) which took on obligations to reduce their greenhouse gas emissions under the Kyoto Protocol. Their combined emissions, averaged out during the 2008-2012 period, should be 5.2% below 1990 levels.

Annex II Countries which have a special obligation under the Kyoto Protocol to provide financial resources and transfer technology to developing countries. This group is a sub-section of the Annex I countries, excluding those that, in 1992, were in transition from centrally planned to a free market economy.

Anthropogenic climate change Man-made climate change - climate change caused by human activity as opposed to natural processes.

Aosis The Alliance of Small Island States comprises 42 island and coastal states mostly in the Pacific and Caribbean. Members of Aosis are some of the countries likely to be hit hardest by global warming. The very existence of low-lying islands, such as the Maldives and some of the Bahamas, is threatened by rising waters.

AR4 The Fourth Assessment Report produced by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) published in 2007. The report assessed and summarised the climate change situation worldwide. It concluded that it was at least 90% likely that the increase of the global average temperature since the mid-20th Century was mainly due to man's activity.

Atmospheric aerosols Microscopic particles suspended in the lower atmosphere that reflect sunlight back to space. These generally have a cooling affect on the planet and can mask global warming. They play a key role in the formation of clouds, fog, precipitation and ozone depletion in the atmosphere.

Bali action plan A plan drawn up at the UN Climate Change Conference in Bali, in December 2007, forming part of the Bali roadmap. The action plan established a working group to define a long-term global goal for reduction of greenhouse gas emissions, and a "shared vision for long-term co-operative action" in the areas of mitigation, adaptation, finance and technology.

Bali roadmap A plan drawn up at the UN Climate Change Conference in Bali, in December 2007, to pave the way for an agreement at Copenhagen in 2009 on further efforts to reduce greenhouse gas emissions after the expiry of the Kyoto Protocol. The roadmap gave deadlines to two working groups, one working on the Bali action plan, and another discussing proposed emission reductions by Annex I countries after 2012.

Baseline for cuts The year against which countries measure their target decrease of emissions. The Kyoto Protocol uses a baseline year of 1990. Some countries prefer to use later baselines. Climate change legislation in the United States, for example, uses a 2005 baseline.

Biofuel A fuel derived from renewable, biological sources, including crops such as maize and sugar cane, and some forms of waste.

Black carbon The soot that results from the incomplete combustion of fossil fuels, biofuels, and biomass (wood, animal dung, etc.). It is the most potent climate-warming aerosol. Unlike greenhouse gases, which trap infrared radiation that is already in the Earth's atmosphere, these particles absorb all wavelengths of sunlight and then re-emit this energy as infrared radiation.

Boxer-Kerry bill The Clean Energy Jobs and American Power Act, now in the US Senate, also known as Waxman-Markey from 2007-2009 as it passed through the House of Representatives. This bill aims to reduce emissions by about 20% from a 2005 baseline by 2020. The bill would create a US-wide carbon market, which in time would link up with other carbon markets, like the EU Emission Trading Scheme. The bill is not expected to get Senate approval until 2010.

Business as usual A scenario used for projections of future emissions assuming no action, or no new action, is taken to mitigate the problem. Some countries are pledging not to reduce their emissions but to make reductions compared to a business as usual scenario. Their emissions, therefore, would increase but less than they would have done.

Cap and trade An emission trading scheme whereby businesses or countries can buy or sell allowances to emit greenhouse gases via an exchange. The volume of allowances issued adds up to the limit, or cap, imposed by the authorities.

Carbon capture and storage (CCS) The collection and transport of concentrated carbon dioxide gas from large emission sources, such as power plants. The gases are then injected into deep underground reservoirs. Carbon capture is sometimes referred to as geological sequestration.

Carbon dioxide (CO2) Carbon dioxide is a gas in the Earth's atmosphere. It occurs naturally and is also a by-product of human activities such as burning fossil fuels. It is the principal greenhouse gas produced by human activity.

Carbon dioxide (CO2) equivalent Six greenhouse gases are limited by the Kyoto Protocol and each has a different global warming potential. The overall warming effect of this cocktail of gases is often expressed in terms of carbon dioxide equivalent - the amount of CO2 that would cause the same amount of warming.

Carbon footprint The amount of carbon emitted by an individual or organisation in a given period of time, or the amount of carbon emitted during the manufacture of a product.

Carbon intensity A unit of measure. The amount of carbon emitted by a country per unit of Gross Domestic Product.

Carbon leakage A term used to refer to the problem whereby industry relocates to countries where emission regimes are weaker, or non-existent.

Carbon neutral A process where there is no net release of CO2. For example, growing biomass takes CO2 out of the atmosphere, while burning it releases the gas again. The process would be carbon neutral if the amount taken out and the amount released were identical. A company or country can also achieve carbon neutrality by means of carbon offsetting.

Carbon offsetting A way of compensating for emissions of CO2 by participating in, or funding, efforts to take CO2 out of the atmosphere. Offsetting often involves paying another party, somewhere else, to save emissions equivalent to those produced by your activity.

Carbon sequestration The process of storing carbon dioxide. This can happen naturally, as growing trees and plants turn CO2 into biomass (wood, leaves, and so on). It can also refer to the capture and storage of CO2 produced by industry. See Carbon capture and storage.

Carbon sink Any process, activity or mechanism that removes carbon from the atmosphere. The biggest carbon sinks are the world's oceans and forests, which absorb large amounts of carbon dioxide from the Earth's atmosphere.

Certified Emission Reduction (CER) A greenhouse gas trading credit, under the UN Clean Development Mechanism programme. A CER may be earned by participating in emission reduction programmes - installing green technology, or planting forests - in developing countries. Each CER is equivalent to one tonne of carbon dioxide.

CFCs The short name for chlorofluorocarbons - a family of gases that have contributed to stratospheric ozone depletion, but which are also potent greenhouse gases. Emissions of CFCs around the developed world are being phased out due to an international control agreement, the 1989 Montreal Protocol.

Clean coal technology Technology that enables coal to be burned without emitting CO2. Some systems currently being developed remove the CO2 before combustion, others remove it afterwards. Clean coal technology is unlikely to be widely available for at least a decade.

Clean Development Mechanism (CDM) A programme that enables developed countries or companies to earn credits by investing in greenhouse gas emission reduction or removal projects in developing countries. These credits can be used to offset emissions and bring the country or company below its mandatory target.

Climate change A pattern of change affecting global or regional climate, as measured by yardsticks such as average temperature and rainfall, or an alteration in frequency of extreme weather conditions. This variation may be caused by both natural processes and human activity. Global warming is one aspect of climate change.

Commitment period The time frame given to parties to the Kyoto Protocol to meet their emission reduction commitments. The first Kyoto commitment period runs from 2008-2012, during which industrialised countries are required collectively to reduce emissions to a level 5% below 1990 levels. Some countries would like the Copenhagen conference to prolong the effective life of the Kyoto Protocol by agreeing explicitly on a second commitment period.

COP15 The official title of the Copenhagen conference, which takes place from 7-18 December 2009. Alternatively, it can be called the 15th Conference of the Parties to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC).

Country in transition Broadly speaking, any ex-Soviet bloc state. At the time the Kyoto Protocol was adopted in 1997, these countries were on the path from a Communist planned economy to a market economy. Many of them would now be categorised as market economies. Countries in transition to a market economy are grouped with industrialised countries in Annex I of the Kyoto Protocol, so they have emission reduction commitments to meet in the 2008-2012 period. In some cases their industrial base collapsed to such a degree in the early 1990s that they will have no difficulty meeting these commitments.

Dangerous climate change A term referring to severe climate change that will have a negative effect on societies, economies, and the environment as a whole. The phrase was introduced by the 1992 UN Framework Convention on Climate Change, which aims to prevent "dangerous" human interference with the climate system.

Deforestation The permanent removal of standing forests that can lead to significant levels of carbon dioxide emissions.

Emission Trading Scheme (ETS) A scheme set up to allow the trading of emissions permits between business and/or countries as part of a cap and trade approach to limiting greenhouse gas emissions. The best-developed example is the EU's trading scheme, launched in 2005. See Cap and trade.

EU Burden-sharing agreement A political agreement that was reached to help the EU reach its emission reduction targets under the Kyoto Protocol (a reduction of 8% during the period 2008-2012, on average, compared with 1990 levels). The 1998 agreement divided the burden unequally amongst member states, taking into account national conditions, including greenhouse gas emissions at the time, the opportunity for reducing them, and countries' levels of economic development.

Feedback loop In a feedback loop, rising temperatures on the Earth change the environment in ways that affect the rate of warming. Feedback loops can be positive (adding to the rate of warming), or negative (reducing it). The melting of Arctic ice provides an example of a positive feedback process. As the ice on the surface of the Arctic Ocean melts away, there is a smaller area of white ice to reflect the Sun's heat back into space and more open, dark water to absorb it. The less ice there is, the more the water heats up, and the faster the remaining ice melts.

Flexible mechanism Instruments that help countries and companies meet emission reduction targets by paying others to reduce emissions for them. The mechanism in widest use is emissions trading, where companies or countries buy and sell permits to pollute. The Kyoto Protocol establishes two flexible mechanisms enabling rich countries to fund emission reduction projects in developing countries - Joint Implementation (JI) and the Clean Development Mechanism (CDM).

Fossil fuels Natural resources, such as coal, oil and natural gas, containing hydrocarbons. These fuels are formed in the Earth over millions of years and produce carbon dioxide when burnt.

G77 The main negotiating bloc for developing countries, allied with China (G77+China). The G77 comprises 130 countries, including India and Brazil, most African countries, the grouping of small island states (Aosis), the Gulf states and many others, from Afghanistan to Zimbabwe.

Geological sequestration The injection of carbon dioxide into underground geological formations. When CO2 is injected into declining oil fields it can help to recover more of the oil.

Global average temperature The mean surface temperature of the Earth measured from three main sources: satellites, monthly readings from a network of over 3,000 surface temperature observation stations and sea surface temperature measurements taken mainly from the fleet of merchant ships, naval ships and data buoys.

Global energy budget The balance between the Earth's incoming and outgoing energy. The current global climate system must adjust to rising greenhouse gas levels and, in the very long term, the Earth must get rid of energy at the same rate at which it receives energy from the sun.

Global dimming An observed widespread reduction in sunlight at the surface of the Earth, which varies significantly between regions. The most likely cause of global dimming is an interaction between sunlight and microscopic aerosol particles from human activities. In some regions, such as Europe, global dimming no longer occurs, thanks to clean air regulations.

Global warming The steady rise in global average temperature in recent decades, which experts believe is largely caused by man-made greenhouse gas emissions. The long-term trend continues upwards, they suggest, even though the warmest year on record, according to the UK's Met Office, is 1998.

Global Warming Potential (GWP) A measure of a greenhouse gas's ability to absorb heat and warm the atmosphere over a given time period. It is measured relative to a similar mass of carbon dioxide, which has a GWP of 1.0. So, for example, methane has a GWP of 25 over 100 years, the metric used in the Kyoto Protocol. It is important to know the timescale, as gases are removed from the atmosphere at different rates.

Greenhouse gases (GHGs) Natural and industrial gases that trap heat from the Earth and warm the surface. The Kyoto Protocol restricts emissions of six greenhouse gases: natural (carbon dioxide, nitrous oxide, and methane) and industrial (perfluorocarbons, hydrofluorocarbons, and sulphur hexafluoride).

Greenhouse effect The insulating effect of certain gases in the atmosphere, which allow solar radiation to warm the earth and then prevent some of the heat from escaping. See also Natural greenhouse effect.

Hockey stick The name given to a graph published in 1998 plotting the average temperature in the Northern hemisphere over the last 1,000 years. The line remains roughly flat until the last 100 years, when it bends sharply upwards. The graph has been cited as evidence to support the idea that global warming is a man-made phenomenon, but some scientists have challenged the data and methodology used to estimate historical temperatures. (It is also known as MBH98 after its creators, Michael E. Mann, Raymond S. Bradley and Malcolm K. Hughes.)

IPCC The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change is a scientific body established by the United Nations Environment Programme and the World Meteorological Organization. It reviews and assesses the most recent scientific, technical, and socio-economic work relevant to climate change, but does not carry out its own research. The IPCC was honoured with the 2007 Nobel Peace Prize.

Joint implementation (JI) An agreement between two parties whereby one party struggling to meet its emission reductions under the Kyoto Protocol earns emission reduction units from another party's emission removal project. The JI is a flexible and cost-efficient way of fulfilling Kyoto agreements while also encouraging foreign investment and technology transfer.

Kyoto Protocol A protocol attached to the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change, which sets legally binding commitments on greenhouse gas emissions. Industrialised countries agreed to reduce their combined emissions to 5.2% below 1990 levels during the five-year period 2008-2012. It was agreed by governments at a 1997 UN conference in Kyoto, Japan, but did not legally come into force until 2005.

Major Economies Forum on Energy and Climate A forum established in 2009 by US President Barack Obama to discuss elements of the agreement that will be negotiated at Copenhagen. Its members - Australia, Brazil, Canada, China, the European Union, France, Germany, India, Indonesia, Italy, Japan, Mexico, Russia, South Africa, South Korea, the UK and the US - account for 80% of greenhouse gas emissions. The forum is a modification of the Major Economies Meeting started by the former President George Bush, which was seen by some countries as an attempt to undermine UN negotiations.

Methane Methane is the second most important man-made greenhouse gas. Sources include both the natural world (wetlands, termites, wildfires) and human activity (agriculture, waste dumps, leaks from coal mining).

Mitigation Action that will reduce man-made climate change. This includes action to reduce greenhouse gas emissions or absorb greenhouse gases in the atmosphere.

Natural greenhouse effect The natural level of greenhouse gases in our atmosphere, which keeps the planet about 30C warmer than it would otherwise be - essential for life as we know it. Water vapour is the most important component of the natural greenhouse effect.

Non-annex I countries The group of developing countries that have signed and ratified the Kyoto Protocol. They do not have binding emission reduction targets.

Per-capita emissions The total amount of greenhouse gas emitted by a country per unit of population.

Pre-industrial levels of carbon dioxide The levels of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere prior to the start of the Industrial Revolution. These levels are estimated to be about 280 parts per million by volume (ppmv). The current level is around 380 ppmv.

REDD Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and forest Degradation, a concept that would provide developing countries with a financial incentive to preserve forests. The Copenhagen conference is expected to finalise an international finance mechanism for the post-2012 global climate change framework.

Technology transfer The process whereby technological advances are shared between different countries. Developed countries could, for example, share up-to-date renewable energy technologies with developing countries, in an effort to lower global greenhouse gas emissions.

UNFCCC The United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change is one of a series of international agreements on global environmental issues adopted at the 1992 Earth Summit in Rio de Janeiro. The UNFCCC aims to prevent "dangerous" human interference with the climate system. It entered into force on 21 March 1994 and has been ratified by 192 countries.

Waxman-Markey bill Another name for the Boxer-Kerry bill, which aims to reduce US greenhouse gas emissions. See Boxer-Kerry bill.

Weather The state of the atmosphere with regard to temperature, cloudiness, rainfall, wind and other meteorological conditions. It is not the same as climate which is the average weather over a much longer period.


Tuesday, November 16, 2010

Impact of Climate Change in South Asia

The impact of climate change in South Asian counties are listed below. It is sourced from WB’s South Asia Climate Change Strategy 2009, pp. 56-59.


Afghanistan
  • Exposure of agriculture (pasture), ecosystems and water resources to drought and desertification
  • Flooding from glacial melt and long run vulnerability of depletion of water supplies of glacial-fed rivers
  • Water and food insecurity, malnutrition and possible migration
    and conflict


Bangladesh
  • Combined impacts of sea level rise and glacial melt lead to increased incidence of flooding and land loss
  • Drought in some areas
  • More intense cyclones
  • Lower agricultural output through diminished yields and loss of land
  • Increased incidence of heat-related illnesses, water-borne diseases, poverty, child and infant mortality; lower access to safe water and sanitation and possible migration
  • Loss of biodiversity in coastal ecosystems – Sunderbans at high risk
  • Mitigation Issues: Increased coal dependence (risks of early transition to coal)


Bhutan
  • Damages from glacial melt
  • Impact of increased temperature on rangelands and agriculture
  • Potential loss of forest biodiversity due to vegetation shift and increased incidence of forest fire due to temperature increase


India
  • Exposure of agriculture, water resources, and ecosystems to extreme weather events and more variable precipitation
  • Impact of glacial melt on water resources quantity, biodiversity and low-lying agriculture
  • Increased heat-related illnesses and water-borne diseases and changes in epidemiological patterns
  • Impacts on urban infrastructure including drainage, water and sanitation
  • Vegetation shift in forests and biodiversity, regime shifts in rangelands, decreased agricultural yields in tropics and subtropics
  • Increased exposure to sea level rise
  • Mitigation issues:
    • Increased emissions from energy production and transformation, transport, urban, agriculture, industrial and residential sectors due to economic growth and urbanization
    • Impact of climate change upon carbon sequestration capacity of forest ecosystems, other biomass and soils


Maldives
  • Ecosystem damages and loss of protection afforded by coral reefs
  • Inundation of islands due to sea level rise and physical damages from flooding
  • Increased salinity of groundwater resources
  • Possible migration and large scale relocation


Nepal
  • Decline in agricultural production in some areas
  • Glacial lake outburst floods (GLOF) and future desiccation of water resources due to rapid glacial melt and impact on dependent ecosystems and agriculture
  • Impact of vegetation shift to forest biodiversity
  • Likely outbreak of malaria and similar diseases
  • Mitigation issues:
    • Impacts on carbon sequestration of vegetation shifts and forest productivity changes
    • Land-use changes due to future development
    • Slash-burn agricultural practices


Pakistan
  • Increased intensity and frequency of drought and effects on agriculture (pasture), water resources and ecosystems (wetlands)
  • Initial flooding and future drying of water resources due to glacial melt and impact on water consumption
  • Damages of sea level rise
  • Outbreak of heat related and insect-transmitted diseases, malnutrition, food and water insecurity, migration and conflict
  • Mitigation issues:
    • Increased emissions from energy, transport and urban sectors
    • Emissions from agriculture and rangeland degradation


Sri Lanka
  • Reduced crop yields due to temperature increase
  • Sea level rise - damages upon settlements, industries and livelihoods in coastal areas
  • Salt water intrusion in agriculture, freshwater and groundwater
  • Ecosystem degradation and biodiversity loss in coastal and marine ecosystems
  • Mitigation issues:
    • Release of stored forest carbon due to land-use changes
    • Increase in thermal power

Monday, November 15, 2010

Growth, Geography and Resource Abundance


“This paper examines the growth experience of the Central Asian economies after the breakup of the Soviet Union. In particular, it evaluates the impact of being landlocked and resource rich. The main conclusions are: (1) Over the period 1994–2006, the landlocked resource-scarce developing countries of Central Asia grew at a slower pace than other landlocked resource-scarce developing countries; on the other hand, resource-rich developing countries in Central Asia grew at the same pace as other resource-rich developing economies. (2) Having “good” neighbors pays off in the form of growth spillovers; this calls for greater regional cooperation and enhanced regional integration through regional transport infrastructure, improved trade facilitation, and enhanced and coordinated economic policies. And (3) countries with a higher share of manufacturing exports in GDP grow faster, and the more sophisticated a country’s export basket, the higher its future growth; Central Asian countries should, therefore, take a more aggressive stance in supporting export diversification and upgrading.”


Here is the full paper by Jesus Felipe and Ustav Kumar. They have also constructed an index of opportunities and ranked countries based on their sophistication of export basket. Meanwhile, the geographic proximity argument was also made by Paul Collier (I think it was in one of the paper he wrote for Commission for Growth & Development).

Saturday, November 13, 2010

Open trade plus social protection for sustained growth

A joint report (Benefits of Trade for Employment and Growth) by the OECD, the ILO, the WTO and the WB, prepared for leaders attending the G20 Summit in Seoul, states that while open trade is always good, it must be complemented by properly designed domestic policies, including employment and social protection policies to ensure that benefits from trade are widely shared. While the crisis has limited growth in many countries, this should not be a reason to go for trade protectionist policies. Instead, trade should be kept open and it should be backed up by social security policies.


The economic crisis showed how open economies are exposed to external shocks, the report adds. But openness to trade also helps economies recover more quickly as they are more adaptable and less dependent on limited domestic demand.

Trade is contributing to the economic recovery. But with high unemployment persisting in many countries, governments must resist protectionism, the organizations say. They underscored that a successful conclusion to the Doha Development Agenda would send a positive signal that governments continue to oppose protectionism and seek new opportunities for growth, development and job creation through trade.

For open trade to boost growth and jobs on a sustained basis, complementary policies to address adjustment problems and distributional concerns are needed to help workers who may lose their jobs as a result of increased international competition. Relevant measures include stable macroeconomic policies, effective labor market and social protection policies, investment in education and enhancing export sectors in developing countries.


While batting for the case of free trade, the report points out a study about NAFTA’s impact on Mexico that finds that on average a 10% reduction in tariffs led to productivity growth of 4-8%. Also, it cites an OECD (2003) study that shows that over the long term, an increase in 10% in trade exposure (trade as a percentage of GDP) was associated with a 4% increase in output per working-age person. However, this report by Eduardo Zepeda et al (2010) shows that under NAFTA, Mexico’s annual growth of GDP per capita has stagnated; there is not much change in total investment; macroeconomic vulnerability has increased; and progress in job growth has been weak. NAFTA’s promise of broad-based dynamic growth has fallen short of its stated goals. So, even if trade as a percentage of GDP increased, economic growth rate was very low. Nepal has one of the highest degree of trade openness (as a percentage of GDP), but its growth is stunted for years now. 

While the studies cited in the report are making valid points, evidence of to its contrary should also be heeded. It means that government should be thinking of why the same expected results were not seen in other countries despite similar trade openness policies. The prerequisites for translating trade openness’s positive impact on growth are missing in many developing countries. The developed countries who vouch for more trade openness should ensure that there is ample funding to institute the required prerequisites in the developing countries, who ideally would get funding based on their initiation on trade openness. There is Aid for Trade and EIF for LDCs facilities in the WTO regime. But, it looks like a sympathetic gesture to quiet the disquiet voice in trade negotiations. It should be seriously thought of in terms of sufficient funding, technology transfer, capacity building, infrastructure, etc.

Also, check out the latest simulation result of changes in employment and real incomes  following good liberalization under the assumption that the G-20 countries implement a 50% MFN tariff reduction and reduce NTB by 50% on an MFN basis. South Korea, China, India, and Thailand benefit the most in terms of increase in real income in the long run. Mexico is going to lose.